, Keith Snyder,
Ralph & Etta Wilborn, Tim Wilborn.
Iraq War
A. Surge Overview (September 2007):
The recent "surge" in Iraq, which should
never have occurred and could never have succeeded, has now
predictably failed. While it may be true that violence in some
parts of Baghdad has declined to June 2006 levels, there has
been an increase in Iraq as a whole in the number of deaths from
political violence. While Vice President Dick Cheney announced
on September 14, 2007, that US and coalition forces were
"getting things right in Iraq" and that the surge had "achieved
solid results," he was wrong again. Ethnic cleansing has
continued in spite of the surge and the humanitarian catastrophe
in Iraq has worsened. There now are about 2.5 million Iraqis who
are refugees in neighboring countries and another 2 million
internally displaced Iraqis. Most of Iraq’s cities and towns
continue to lack regular electricity, sanitation, water and
other basic services. Nearly half of the Iraqis remain
unemployed.
The surge has done nothing to create security
in and around Baghdad to give Iraqi politicians breathing room
to pursue reconciliation, the stated purpose of the surge. Since
the surge was announced, over 600 servicemen and servicewomen
have been killed and over 4000 injured. There has been a morally
indefensible sacrifice of American and Iraqi lives in pursuit of
unachievable goals. Because the Iraq War has been long lost, the
time is NOW to bring it to a close. We believe that the
withdrawal of US forces as quickly as possible is the best
course of action for the United States, Iraq and the region.
This would open the way for international mediation and
peacekeeping efforts. The honorable way to prevent regional
destabilization requires refocusing regional efforts and helping
Iraq and its neighbors cope with the humanitarian crisis the US
helped create.
Withdrawing American troops from Iraq is not
only in our own national interest, it is the morally and
responsible action to take. American power has failed to bring
order and democracy to the region. The moral shortcomings of
Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Pearle, Powell and Rice, the
architects of this war, are self-evident.
Former President George H.W. Bush in his 1998
memoir, "A World Transformed," understood the dilemma facing the
United States following the first Gulf War in Iraq, stating as
follows:
There are people in Washington ... who
never intend to withdraw military forces from Iraq and
they're looking for 10, 20, 50 years in the future ... the
reason that we went into Iraq [in 1991] was to establish a
permanent military base in the Gulf region, and I have
never heard any of our leaders say that they would commit
themselves to the Iraqi people that 10 years from now
there will be no military bases of the United States in
Iraq.
B. Will We Be in Iraq for Another 100 Years?
(April 2008):
Five years after we began Iraqi Freedom, it
is time to ponder the following:
- Weapons of mass destruction were non-existent
- We were not welcomed as liberators
- The war has failed to pay for itself
- There was no smoking gun
- No connection with 9/11 was found
- Iraq now is a recruiting place for Islamic terrorists
- Baghdad still has electricity only some of the time
- The projected cost of the war is now over
$3,000,000,000,000, i.e., over three trillion dollars
- Our economy is now in a recession
- Bush’s folly has led us over a cliff
There have been over 4,000 American soldiers
killed in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed, and tens
of thousands badly wounded.
As summed up by Hans Blix recently in The
Guardian in England:
"The invasion of Iraq in 2003 [is] a
tragedy—for Iraq, for the U.S., for the U.N., for truth and human dignity."
Burma’s Saffron Revolution Overview
In August of this year, the Burmese people began a new
chapter in their effort to find peace and freedom for their
war-torn country. Burma’s Buddhist monks began peacefully
protesting in their attempt to bring change for the
long-suffering people of Burma. As the saffron robed monks
marched, tens of thousands joined the monks, reinforcing their
collective demand that military rule finally give way to the
people's desire for democracy.
Video and the internet initially allowed the world to witness
the brutal response directed by the military junta and Gen. Than
Shwe, Burma's de facto ruler and supreme military despot. Than
Shwe’s response was to unleash his soldiers and the military
junta’s thugs who attacked the monks and the people supporting
them. The streets in Rangoon and Mandalay again were filled with
the red blood of innocent monks and their supporters who were
merely seeking to save Burma from the moral, social, political
and economic crises that have consumed Burma since the military
took over in 1962.
Hundreds of the Buddhist monks and nuns have been beaten and
arrested, and many have been murdered. Thousands of Buddhist
clergy have disappeared. Many of Burma’s sacred monasteries have
been looted and destroyed. Intelligence units of the military
junta continue to round up political and religious leaders.
The repressive actions of Burma’s military junta have ruined
Burma’s economy. Burma was once the breadbasket of Asia, but now
cannot feed itself. Burma once had an excellent educational
system and the highest literacy rate in Asia, but once again the
military junta has closed schools and universities, the literacy
rate now being less than one-third of what it used to be.
China and Russia continue to block the United
Nations’ Security Council from facilitating a dialogue between
democratic forces in Burma and the military junta. Senior
officials of the ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations)
have condemned the military junta’s actions but have done little
else, each of the member countries continuing to trade with
Burma. India, the world's largest democracy, as well as China,
South Korea, Thailand and Malaysia continue to make economic
investments in Burma, as well as provide military assistance
and/or trade with Burma that helps finance the military junta’s
war against its own people.
The United Nations must help bring peace to
Burma, the Security Council being the proper forum. Security
Council members must take the steps necessary to coerce the
military junta to come to terms with the aspirations of the
people of Burma. This involves setting a timetable for the
military junta to release all political prisoners including Aung
San Suu Kyi, permit free assembly of the people of Burma, and
provide a full accounting of the thousands of Burmese who have
disappeared. The Security Council must tighten sanctions by
enforcing an embargo on all arms sales to the military junta.
The sanctions likeliest to pressure the military junta are
banking restrictions imposed on the top Burmese officials, their
relatives, and the corrupt businessmen close to them. The Bush
administration has led the way with such sanctions, and
Australia has followed. The question remains as to whether
European counties have the backbone to join in.
Burma's Saffron Revolution has only now just begun. The military
junta’s use of mass arrests, murder, torture and imprisonment
will not extinguish the desire of the people of Burma for the
freedom that was taken from them in 1962.
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
December 10, 2007, began a yearlong advocacy
campaign commemorating the 60th anniversary of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights which the United Nations
ratified by a vote of 48 to 0 on December 10, 1948. President
Bush hailed the Universal Declaration before the United Nations
General Assembly in late September 2007, extolling the document
as "a landmark achievement in the history of human liberty."
Article 5 of the Universal Declaration states
that nobody "shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman
or degrading treatment or punishment." Article 6 affirms that
everybody "has the right to recognition everywhere as a person
before the law." Article 25 further provides as follows:
Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for
the health and well-being of himself and of his family,
including food, clothing, housing and medical care, and
necessary social services.
One can only wonder whether President Bush,
before he spoke to the United Nations in September 2007, had
ever read his speech, no prior President likely having
gift-wrapped in any loftier rhetoric his foreign policy, nor
been more successful in discrediting the sincerity of our
country’s commitment to human rights. As citizens of the earth’s
wealthiest country, we would appreciate that the provisions of
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights be observed by the
U.S., the only industrialized country except South Africa which
does not provide universal health coverage for its citizens and
non-citizens.
Sustainability Policy
The firm management of Halpern & Oliver, PLLC,
consisting of the Partners and Office Manager, intends to
establish sustainable office practices consistent with its
overall commitment to provide excellent legal services to
clients. This policy is adopted to implement that intent.
The best-known definition of sustainability
is contained in a 1987 report Our Common Future
commissioned by the UN World Commission of Environment and
Development:
Sustainable development is meeting the needs
of the present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs.
We recognize that all human activity,
including the operation of a law office, has an impact on the
environment and the natural world. Within Halpern & Oliver, PLLC,
we make daily choices in performing work that can either reduce
or increase that impact. As a firm we seek to reduce the impact.
Education. Because the daily actions of
each person in the firm will contribute to the success of this
policy, this policy includes a provision for education of all
new lawyers and staff on sustainability matters. In the long
run, the initiative of each individual will be the key to the
success of the policy.
Sustainability Coordinator. One person
shall be designated as the Sustainability Coordinator for the
firm. The time allocated for work as Coordinator shall be
determined by the firm management. The Coordinator shall
organize and lead the Sustainability Team, be responsible for
training all employees in an understanding of sustainability,
make recommendations to firm management to implement the policy,
and keep awareness of this policy at a high level within Halpern
& Oliver, PLLC.
Sustainability Team. The Sustainability
Team will meet on a regular basis to evaluate current practices,
determine priorities in carrying out this policy, and educate
and motivate lawyers and staff to move toward sustainable
practices. Anyone with ideas for improving the firm's
performance is encouraged to contact a member of the
Sustainability Team. The Sustainability Team will make periodic
reports to the firm management regarding the progress Halpern &
Oliver, PLLC, is making toward sustainability.
Purchasing. Sustainability shall
be considered in the purchase of supplies, equipment, and
services. Examples of sustainability criteria are recyclability,
biodegradability, recycled content, waste minimization,
hazardous-chemical free, energy conservation, resource
conservation, locally manufactured and organic.
Waste Reduction and Recycling. Subject to
security and other requirements, policies shall be established
that minimize the use of paper in data storage, printing and
copying, internal and external communications, and mailing.
Systems will be established to minimize disposables and
packaging, reuse equipment and supplies where feasible, and
maximize recycling of all items that can be recycled in this
region.
Energy. Policies shall be established
that encourage energy conservation and efficiency in
heating/cooling, lighting and equipment.
Travel. The Sustainability Team shall
consider means for reducing business travel, including
teleconferencing options, strategies for reducing the impact of
travel, and carbon offsets.
Commuting. The firm management shall
establish commuter incentives to encourage use of mass transit,
carpooling, walking, jogging and bicycling.
Carbon Credits/Green Power. Halpern &
Oliver, PLLC, will consider the purchase of carbon credits to
offset all or a portion of the greenhouse gas emissions
associated with our operations and the purchase of green power
to encourage alternatives to fossil fuels.
Tenant Improvements. When office
improvements are made, Halpern & Oliver, PLLC, shall specify
materials that are the least hazardous and most natural and give
preference to those that are high in recycled content,
recyclable or biodegradable, certified sustainable and durable.
Implementation and Measuring Success. In
implementing this policy, Halpern & Oliver, PLLC personnel shall
consider three documents prepared by Oregon Lawyers for a
Sustainable Future and available on its Web site
www.earthleadershipcenter.org/OLSF/office_practice):
(1) Sustainable Practices of the Law
Office, (2) Best Practices of Office Building Management,
and(3) Guidelines for Tenant Improvements. Where
practicable, baselines shall be established for practices that
can be measured--such as paper used, recycled content of
supplies, disposables purchased, percentage of office waste that
is recycled, and electricity used. Progress shall be reported at
least annually.